tsk tsk

I was stunned with what Drilon said awhile ago in congress. He said that they were not talking about Garci and the other senators and congressmen who talked with him; rather, they were talking about Garci and his conversation with Pres. Arroyo. Seriously, I found this stupid. Why is it that the president has to face this situation because she talked with Garci (and the fact that we're not 100% sure that they talked about cheating) while the issue about these other politicians who also had a conversation with Garci should not be put up. I just don't get it. Isn't it a bit unfair? If they too, talked with Garci then why shouldn't they also talk about it? It doesn't mean that the main issue is about the president that we have to set aside these things. The only difference is that she hold a higher position than the others. Let me put it in simple terms. For example there's a class who's taking their test. One of the students told the teacher that she saw the president of their class holding this paper which seems to have the answers of the test. She even told the teacher that girl 2, the one seated beside the president, saw everything. Then the teacher called on girl 2 and talked to her. Girl 2 told the teacher that she did see the president holding a sheet of paper but she wasn't sure if it really had the answers of the test. Girl 2 also said that she saw 5 more of her classmates holding sheets of paper and who also seemed to be cheating. Now tell me, should the teacher also investigate on the 5 other girls or just the president of the class? See, this what I'm saying. Politics is really very dirty but I guess, that's how it goes.

i'm nervous

I submitted my Ateneo application with my essay. I'm nervous. We'll be having an exam on Jan. 15. Oh God, I hope I get in. :) It's like applying for college. I'm stressed out with this whole thing. haha But it's fine. :)